<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel House &#187; Ebert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielhouse.com/tag/ebert/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielhouse.com</link>
	<description>social media :: music :: movies :: random ephemera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 04:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert &#8211; Words On Bone</title>
		<link>http://danielhouse.com/roger-ebert-words-on-bone.html</link>
		<comments>http://danielhouse.com/roger-ebert-words-on-bone.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel House</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielhouse.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now, many if not most of you have already been made aware of – if not have already read – the extensive February 16th article from Esquire entitled Roger Ebert: The Essential Man. A reference perhaps to Leonard Cohen’s “I’m Your Man,” the song that Ebert purportedly played repeatedly while in his hospital room [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="googlePlusOneButton"><g:plusone href="http://danielhouse.com/roger-ebert-words-on-bone.html"  size="tall"   ></g:plusone></div><br /><p>By now, many if not most of you have already  been made aware of – if not have already read – the extensive February 16th  article from Esquire entitled <em><a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/roger-ebert-0310" target="_blank">Roger Ebert: The  Essential Man</a></em>. A reference perhaps to <a href="http://www.leonardcohen.com/" target="_blank">Leonard Cohen</a>’s “<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r24_T-HOcyg" target="_blank">I’m Your Man</a>,” the song  that Ebert purportedly played repeatedly while in his hospital room after one  of the many cancer surgeries that he’s had to endure since his first one in  2002, the article is a moving and bittersweet account of a man whose  contribution to the world of film is immeasurable.</p>
<p>I first became aware of <a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/" target="_blank">Roger Ebert</a> in the late ‘70s, when  he and Gene Siskel, his partner for over 20 years went into national  syndication with their <em><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/when-siskel-ebert-were-sneak-p.html" target="_blank">Sneak  Previews</a> </em>show on <a href="http://www.pbs.org/" target="_blank">PBS</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/roger-ebert-0310" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.danielhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ebert-esquire.jpg" border="0" alt="Roger Ebert can no longer speak" width="460" height="557" /></a></p>
<p>For me, their show was essential viewing,  intelligent discussion about film, and not just the mainstream movies of the  day, but also the obscure underground art-house films that could only be viewed  in some of the larger cities across America. I was going to Berkeley high at  the time, was a terribly shy teen, and spent a <em>lot </em>of my free time going  to movies &#8211; usually by myself. We had the <a href="http://www.berkeleyheritage.com/berkeley_landmarks/uc_theater.html" target="_blank">UC  Theater</a>, one of the early <a href="http://www.landmarktheatres.com/" target="_blank">Landmark  Theater</a> screens, and they played a different double feature pretty much  every night. I could be found there three or four nights (or days if on the  weekend) during any given week. Each week however, I would always try to make sure  that I was somewhere with a TV nearby when <em>Sneak Previews</em> aired. As much  as was possible I would never miss a show.</p>
<p>Ebert’s commentary – his <em>words</em> – about film were an  essential part of my filmic diet, a veritable classroom doled out in weekly  portions, something to be relished. Regardless if I agreed or disagreed with  either of the critics, their discourse would invariably spark the critic within <em>me</em>. Their weekly discussions about various films and their relative  merit helped to make me a more critical thinker, and ultimately a more astute  and critical viewer of film. Keep in mind this is a guy who won a Pulitzer  Prize for his work as a film critic, back in 1975, years before he was on TV!</p>
<p>In 1981, I moved to Seattle. The following year Siskel and  Ebert moved to network television, and extended their reach to mainstream  audiences. I continued to watch Siskel and Ebert review and debate movies until  Siskel’s death in 1999, and continued to tune in to Ebert and his new partner  Richard Roper who was his co-host until 2006. My love for film never subsided,  and throughout, Ebert was a constant voice, one that I did not always agree  with, but one that would invariably give me some new perspective to consider. I  thank him for that.</p>
<p>Now his battle with cancer has taken his ability to speak.  His entire lower jaw has been removed: The bone that was once there is gone. He  cannot eat or drink; he has no voice, no <em>spoken</em> voice anyway. As a  writer however, he is more prolific than ever, and since 2008 (when in the  midst of a particularly bad fight with cancer) <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/" target="_blank">Ebert has been chronicling his  experiences and thoughts in a blog</a> that has – as of the writing of the Esquire  article – surpassed half a million words!</p>
<p>In the article, Ebert writes: “When I am writing, my  problems become invisible and I am the same person I always was.” I read this,  and I read it again. I am stunned. He is 67 years old. He has devoted his life  to the things he’s loved the most, has honed his craft and continued to sharpen  his creative self, and when dealt with a blow that would take the juice out of  pretty much anybody I can think of, he finds the sweet nugget and savors the  little thing that makes it special. His cancer is in a state of remission, and  hopefully it will never return. I cannot imagine what it would be like to go  through the ordeal that Roger Ebert has had to endure, but through it all it  appears that he has managed to keep his focus, and <em>somehow</em> he has  managed to find joy in the things that make his life rich.</p>
<p>This is not a lesson on film, but it is most certainly a  powerful lesson in life.  As trite as it may sound, I think we can <em>all</em> do better to learn  to let the petty shit go so that we can more fully appreciate the small things that  make our lives rich. I will certainly do <em>my</em> best find inspiration in the  sweet nuggets.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/02/roger_eberts_last_words_cont.html" target="_blank">Read Ebert&#8217;s Response to the Esquire Article</a></p>
<p><a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=greatmovies_fulllist" target="_blank">See Ebert&#8217;s 323 (and counting) Greatest Movies of all Time</a> (alphabetical)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielhouse.com/roger-ebert-words-on-bone.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

