<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel House &#187; Avatar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielhouse.com/tag/avatar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielhouse.com</link>
	<description>social media :: music :: movies :: random ephemera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Avatar Vs. Hurt Locker: Flash Vs. Substance</title>
		<link>http://danielhouse.com/avatar_vs_hurt_locker.html</link>
		<comments>http://danielhouse.com/avatar_vs_hurt_locker.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel House</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielhouse.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over this last weekend, I finally got around to seeing Avatar in 3D, and then yesterday the Oscar nominees came out. Unsurprisingly, Avatar was one of the picks for the most coveted of the Academy awards, the Best Picture. I understand why it was nominated, and I expect it may likely win. I also expect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="clear:left; float: left; margin-right: 30px; margin-left:10px; margin-top:10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielhouse.com%2Favatar_vs_hurt_locker.html"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielhouse.com%2Favatar_vs_hurt_locker.html&amp;source=dhouse&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Over this last weekend, I finally got around to seeing  Avatar in 3D, and then yesterday the Oscar nominees came out. Unsurprisingly,  Avatar was one of the picks for the most coveted of the Academy awards, the  Best Picture. I understand why it was nominated, and I expect it may likely  win. I also expect that Cameron may well win for best director as well. That  said, I do not think it or he deserves the win. Avatar, which managed to win  both awards at <a href="http://www.goldenglobes.org" target="_blank">the Golden Globes</a>, did not win either award at the <a href="http://www.dga.org/index2.php3" target="_blank">Directors  Guild</a> (DGA), the awards event that gave the nod to <a href="http://thehurtlocker-movie.com" target="_blank">The Hurt Locker</a>, the film that  deserves to win hands-down.</p>
<p>Sure, <a href="http://www.avatarmovie.com" target="_blank">Avatar</a> raked it in at the box office, already having earned the unbelievable sum of <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avatar.htm" target="_blank">over 2 BILLION worldwide</a>. Hurt Locker  meanwhile earned only $12 <em>million</em>, a pittance by comparative standards.</p>
<p>Bottom-line: Cameron knows how to make big splashy  mainstream Hollywood films that rake in big bucks. He is responsible for the  Terminator franchise, one or two of the Alien movies, and another Oscar winner  Titanic, a movie that I – in the minority –did not much care for. Cameron is  Hollywood royalty. He spends boatloads money making grand epics and earns it  back ten-fold…and the Academy loves grand epic films with high box office  receipts…so who cares if the story isn’t there to back up the spectacle? This  is not always the case, but it’s happened too often to overlook. Past  cases-in-point: A Beautiful Mind, Gladiator, Braveheart, Forrest Gump, Dances  With Wolves, and of course Titanic. Go ahead and call me a blowhard, but I  think that these movies were <em>all</em> beautifully polished turds, albeit polished  turds with impressive budgets.</p>
<p><a href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/01/james-camerons-avatar-disneys-pocahontas" target="_blank"><img src="http://danielhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/avatar-bluemeenie.jpg" border="0" alt="Avatar Blue Meenie" width="480" height="264" /></a></p>
<p>Now don’t get me wrong. I enjoyed Avatar, I really did. I do <em>not </em>put in the category of a turd &#8211; not at all. I  think that Cameron created a beautiful and remarkable world on Pandora. I  appreciated the astonishing attention to all the production design, the visual  effects, makeup, and the great attention paid to every last detail, but when  you’ve got 4+ years and <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/oscars/2009/12/how-much-did-avatar-really-cost.html" target="_blank">a reported $280 million</a> to spend, I expect as much&#8230;and I was duly entertained. I do have issues however. First with the story. The Avatar concept was <em>interesting</em>, but was nothing even remotely original. If  you haven’t seen it yet on Facebook or elsewhere, the now-classic <a href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/01/james-camerons-avatar-disneys-pocahontas" target="_blank">comparison  between Avatar and Disney’s Pocahontas</a> pretty much nails it. Face it folks,  it’s Technicolor fluff with guns and lots of big explosions. Another web  phenomenon, but also a really strange and questionable choice, was that of  using <a href="http://www.papyruswatch.com/2009/08/avatar-really.html" target="_blank">Papyrus as the font for the titles and subtitles</a>. It was a very  distracting disconnect, especially for those of us who have a deep fondness for  font in design.</p>
<p>I found Cameron’s heavy-handed, hardly transparent and  self-righteous political correctness with his obvious analogies to Native  Americans (getting back to Pocahontas) and their “connection to all things  living,” a people in touch with the natural energies of the world,  manipulative. His obvious “green” messages about energy dependence vs. a purer  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism" target="_blank">Pantheist</a> view of the world (which I in fact embrace) were smug and  sanctimonious.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.avatarmovie.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://danielhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/avatar-cost.jpg" border="0" alt="We have technology...and LOTS of money!" width="475" height="265" /></a></p>
<p>The piece that really surprised me however was how the films  starts first with our common enemy, the evil  hawk of a general, engaging in a non-provoked aggression against a lesser race for  their natural energy supplies (sounds familiar, right?), which of course we rally  against, feeling politically correct ourselves [look up <a href="http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/activity/imperialism/" target="_top">The White Man’s Burden</a>].  Our hero, a jarhead with the muddled sensibility of a blue-collar Jersey  construction worker has apparently experienced a spiritual awakening of sorts,  and comes back to save the day (as the natives are clearly incapable of saving  themselves). A seemingly unintended message, we are left with a subtly  patronizing act of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noblesse_oblige" target="_blank">noblesse oblige</a>, wherein the (enlightened) white man has to  come in and help the savages out. The subtext is one of superiority, that we  must help those out that cannot help themselves, because <em>they</em> are  inevitably inferior and ignorant.</p>
<p>Hurt Locker on the other hand, was powerful in the most  visceral sense, in the deepest emotionally impacting sense. It is a film about  real brutality, and is portrayed in such a way as to make you feel like a fly  on the wall observer. It takes hard looks into the damaged psyche of soldiers  in war, and should be included in the list of the great war movies along  with Gallipoli, Paths of Glory, Full Metal Jacket, Platoon and The Deer Hunter.  It is a beautiful film dealing with the stark and upsetting realities of war,  and is an undeniable piece of modern-day classic cinema…and it deserves to win  the best picture Oscar along with Katherine Bigelow for best director. <a href="http://thehurtlocker-movie.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://danielhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hurt-locker.jpg" border="0" alt="The Hurt Locker" width="475" height="307" /></a></p>
<p>This battle between the Epic Goliath that is Avatar  against the smaller, but ultimately more powerful Hurt Locker is of even greater and gossipier  interest as Katherine Bigelow and James Cameron were once married. What’s more,  it it’s entire 82 years of existence, The Academy has <em>never</em> given the  best director award to a woman. Speaking of political correctness, giving the  woman the award would be the “right thing to do,” but more than that, her work  is simply more deserving. <a href="http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/82/nominees.html" target="_blank">The 82nd Academy Awards</a> airs on March 7th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielhouse.com/avatar_vs_hurt_locker.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

