<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel House &#187; Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielhouse.com/category/movies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielhouse.com</link>
	<description>social media :: music :: movies :: random ephemera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jane Birkin in 1970 Film, &#8220;Sex Power&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://danielhouse.com/sex-power.html</link>
		<comments>http://danielhouse.com/sex-power.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel House</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Birkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vangelis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielhouse.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow&#8230;cool obscure little find: In 1970 Henry Chapier directed &#8220;Sex Power,&#8221;  a film with Jane Birkin and enlisted the talents of Vangelis to write the score (this was his very first film score after leaving Greece). It played the San Sebastian Film Festival where it won the Silver Shell Award and quickly slipped away into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="clear:left; float: left; margin-right: 30px; margin-left:10px; margin-top:10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielhouse.com%2Fsex-power.html"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielhouse.com%2Fsex-power.html&amp;source=dhouse&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Wow&#8230;cool obscure little find: In 1970 <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.henry-chapier.com/" target="_blank">Henry Chapier</a> directed &#8220;Sex Power,&#8221;  a film with <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.janebirkin.net/uk/film.html" target="_blank">Jane Birkin</a> and enlisted the talents of <a rel="nofollow" href="http://elsew.com" target="_blank">Vangelis </a>to write the score (this was his very first film score after leaving Greece). It played the San Sebastian Film Festival where it won the Silver Shell Award and quickly slipped away into obscurity. The soundtrack however was the only one of Chapier&#8217;s films to ever get its score released.</p>
<p>Most of the dialogue is in English, and the feel of the film has a charmingly naive impressionistic, psychedelic bent.<br />
<div class="iframe-wrapper">
  <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/34346369?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff" frameborder="0" style="height:260px;width:460px;">Please upgrade your browser</iframe>
</div><br />
&#8220;Sex Power&#8221;  captures a similar vibe of some of the artier films of the time, films like El Topo and Zabriskie Point,  and I think exemplify the same  influences as are present from the late 1960s.  Even the French wanted to be from California back then.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-435" title="Jane Birkin " src="http://danielhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Jane-Birkin2.jpg" alt="Jane Birkin " width="460" height="286" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielhouse.com/sex-power.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ronald Reagan and James Dean in &#8220;The Dark, Dark Hours&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://danielhouse.com/reagan_dean-1954.html</link>
		<comments>http://danielhouse.com/reagan_dean-1954.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel House</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kinescope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielhouse.com/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Dark, Dark Hours&#8221; was first broadcast live from Hollywood on December 12, 1954 from the General Electric Theater series. It features both Ronald Reagan and James Dean before either of them were huge names in Hollywood. John Meroney of the Atlantic describes how the footage was found: &#8220;No one has seen this episode in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="clear:left; float: left; margin-right: 30px; margin-left:10px; margin-top:10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielhouse.com%2Freagan_dean-1954.html"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielhouse.com%2Freagan_dean-1954.html&amp;source=dhouse&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>&#8220;The Dark, Dark Hours&#8221; was first broadcast live from Hollywood on December 12, 1954 from the General Electric Theater series. It features both Ronald Reagan and James Dean before either of them were huge names in Hollywood.<br />
<object id="flashObj" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="486" height="412" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=79091004001&amp;playerID=30183073001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAABvb_NGE~,DMkZt2E6wO3lsjaOMNOMkyjiqH9bjF0P&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" /><param name="name" value="flashObj" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoId=79091004001&amp;playerID=30183073001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAABvb_NGE~,DMkZt2E6wO3lsjaOMNOMkyjiqH9bjF0P&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="flashObj" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="486" height="412" src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" name="flashObj" allowscriptaccess="always" swliveconnect="true" allowfullscreen="true" seamlesstabbing="false" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" flashvars="videoId=79091004001&amp;playerID=30183073001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAABvb_NGE~,DMkZt2E6wO3lsjaOMNOMkyjiqH9bjF0P&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"></embed></object></p>
<p>John Meroney of <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theatlantic.com" target="_blank">the Atlantic </a>describes how the footage was found:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;No one has seen this episode in the decades since; the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.museum.tv/eotvsection.php?entrycode=kinescope" target="_blank">kinescope </a>has been locked away, until now. My friend <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.waynefederman.com" target="_blank">Wayne Federman</a>,  a writer for NBC&#8217;s Late Night with Jimmy Fallon, unearthed the  broadcast, condensing it from its original 23 minutes (without  commercials) into the six-minute version you see [here].&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielhouse.com/reagan_dean-1954.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert &#8211; Words On Bone</title>
		<link>http://danielhouse.com/roger-ebert-words-on-bone.html</link>
		<comments>http://danielhouse.com/roger-ebert-words-on-bone.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel House</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielhouse.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now, many if not most of you have already been made aware of – if not have already read – the extensive February 16th article from Esquire entitled Roger Ebert: The Essential Man. A reference perhaps to Leonard Cohen’s “I’m Your Man,” the song that Ebert purportedly played repeatedly while in his hospital room [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="clear:left; float: left; margin-right: 30px; margin-left:10px; margin-top:10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielhouse.com%2Froger-ebert-words-on-bone.html"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielhouse.com%2Froger-ebert-words-on-bone.html&amp;source=dhouse&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>By now, many if not most of you have already  been made aware of – if not have already read – the extensive February 16th  article from Esquire entitled <em><a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/roger-ebert-0310" target="_blank">Roger Ebert: The  Essential Man</a></em>. A reference perhaps to <a href="http://www.leonardcohen.com/" target="_blank">Leonard Cohen</a>’s “<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r24_T-HOcyg" target="_blank">I’m Your Man</a>,” the song  that Ebert purportedly played repeatedly while in his hospital room after one  of the many cancer surgeries that he’s had to endure since his first one in  2002, the article is a moving and bittersweet account of a man whose  contribution to the world of film is immeasurable.</p>
<p>I first became aware of <a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/" target="_blank">Roger Ebert</a> in the late ‘70s, when  he and Gene Siskel, his partner for over 20 years went into national  syndication with their <em><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/when-siskel-ebert-were-sneak-p.html" target="_blank">Sneak  Previews</a> </em>show on <a href="http://www.pbs.org/" target="_blank">PBS</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/roger-ebert-0310" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.danielhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ebert-esquire.jpg" border="0" alt="Roger Ebert can no longer speak" width="460" height="557" /></a></p>
<p>For me, their show was essential viewing,  intelligent discussion about film, and not just the mainstream movies of the  day, but also the obscure underground art-house films that could only be viewed  in some of the larger cities across America. I was going to Berkeley high at  the time, was a terribly shy teen, and spent a <em>lot </em>of my free time going  to movies &#8211; usually by myself. We had the <a href="http://www.berkeleyheritage.com/berkeley_landmarks/uc_theater.html" target="_blank">UC  Theater</a>, one of the early <a href="http://www.landmarktheatres.com/" target="_blank">Landmark  Theater</a> screens, and they played a different double feature pretty much  every night. I could be found there three or four nights (or days if on the  weekend) during any given week. Each week however, I would always try to make sure  that I was somewhere with a TV nearby when <em>Sneak Previews</em> aired. As much  as was possible I would never miss a show.</p>
<p>Ebert’s commentary – his <em>words</em> – about film were an  essential part of my filmic diet, a veritable classroom doled out in weekly  portions, something to be relished. Regardless if I agreed or disagreed with  either of the critics, their discourse would invariably spark the critic within <em>me</em>. Their weekly discussions about various films and their relative  merit helped to make me a more critical thinker, and ultimately a more astute  and critical viewer of film. Keep in mind this is a guy who won a Pulitzer  Prize for his work as a film critic, back in 1975, years before he was on TV!</p>
<p>In 1981, I moved to Seattle. The following year Siskel and  Ebert moved to network television, and extended their reach to mainstream  audiences. I continued to watch Siskel and Ebert review and debate movies until  Siskel’s death in 1999, and continued to tune in to Ebert and his new partner  Richard Roper who was his co-host until 2006. My love for film never subsided,  and throughout, Ebert was a constant voice, one that I did not always agree  with, but one that would invariably give me some new perspective to consider. I  thank him for that.</p>
<p>Now his battle with cancer has taken his ability to speak.  His entire lower jaw has been removed: The bone that was once there is gone. He  cannot eat or drink; he has no voice, no <em>spoken</em> voice anyway. As a  writer however, he is more prolific than ever, and since 2008 (when in the  midst of a particularly bad fight with cancer) <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/" target="_blank">Ebert has been chronicling his  experiences and thoughts in a blog</a> that has – as of the writing of the Esquire  article – surpassed half a million words!</p>
<p>In the article, Ebert writes: “When I am writing, my  problems become invisible and I am the same person I always was.” I read this,  and I read it again. I am stunned. He is 67 years old. He has devoted his life  to the things he’s loved the most, has honed his craft and continued to sharpen  his creative self, and when dealt with a blow that would take the juice out of  pretty much anybody I can think of, he finds the sweet nugget and savors the  little thing that makes it special. His cancer is in a state of remission, and  hopefully it will never return. I cannot imagine what it would be like to go  through the ordeal that Roger Ebert has had to endure, but through it all it  appears that he has managed to keep his focus, and <em>somehow</em> he has  managed to find joy in the things that make his life rich.</p>
<p>This is not a lesson on film, but it is most certainly a  powerful lesson in life.  As trite as it may sound, I think we can <em>all</em> do better to learn  to let the petty shit go so that we can more fully appreciate the small things that  make our lives rich. I will certainly do <em>my</em> best find inspiration in the  sweet nuggets.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/02/roger_eberts_last_words_cont.html" target="_blank">Read Ebert&#8217;s Response to the Esquire Article</a></p>
<p><a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=greatmovies_fulllist" target="_blank">See Ebert&#8217;s 323 (and counting) Greatest Movies of all Time</a> (alphabetical)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielhouse.com/roger-ebert-words-on-bone.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avatar Vs. Hurt Locker: Flash Vs. Substance</title>
		<link>http://danielhouse.com/avatar_vs_hurt_locker.html</link>
		<comments>http://danielhouse.com/avatar_vs_hurt_locker.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel House</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielhouse.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over this last weekend, I finally got around to seeing Avatar in 3D, and then yesterday the Oscar nominees came out. Unsurprisingly, Avatar was one of the picks for the most coveted of the Academy awards, the Best Picture. I understand why it was nominated, and I expect it may likely win. I also expect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="clear:left; float: left; margin-right: 30px; margin-left:10px; margin-top:10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielhouse.com%2Favatar_vs_hurt_locker.html"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdanielhouse.com%2Favatar_vs_hurt_locker.html&amp;source=dhouse&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Over this last weekend, I finally got around to seeing  Avatar in 3D, and then yesterday the Oscar nominees came out. Unsurprisingly,  Avatar was one of the picks for the most coveted of the Academy awards, the  Best Picture. I understand why it was nominated, and I expect it may likely  win. I also expect that Cameron may well win for best director as well. That  said, I do not think it or he deserves the win. Avatar, which managed to win  both awards at <a href="http://www.goldenglobes.org" target="_blank">the Golden Globes</a>, did not win either award at the <a href="http://www.dga.org/index2.php3" target="_blank">Directors  Guild</a> (DGA), the awards event that gave the nod to <a href="http://thehurtlocker-movie.com" target="_blank">The Hurt Locker</a>, the film that  deserves to win hands-down.</p>
<p>Sure, <a href="http://www.avatarmovie.com" target="_blank">Avatar</a> raked it in at the box office, already having earned the unbelievable sum of <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avatar.htm" target="_blank">over 2 BILLION worldwide</a>. Hurt Locker  meanwhile earned only $12 <em>million</em>, a pittance by comparative standards.</p>
<p>Bottom-line: Cameron knows how to make big splashy  mainstream Hollywood films that rake in big bucks. He is responsible for the  Terminator franchise, one or two of the Alien movies, and another Oscar winner  Titanic, a movie that I – in the minority –did not much care for. Cameron is  Hollywood royalty. He spends boatloads money making grand epics and earns it  back ten-fold…and the Academy loves grand epic films with high box office  receipts…so who cares if the story isn’t there to back up the spectacle? This  is not always the case, but it’s happened too often to overlook. Past  cases-in-point: A Beautiful Mind, Gladiator, Braveheart, Forrest Gump, Dances  With Wolves, and of course Titanic. Go ahead and call me a blowhard, but I  think that these movies were <em>all</em> beautifully polished turds, albeit polished  turds with impressive budgets.</p>
<p><a href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/01/james-camerons-avatar-disneys-pocahontas" target="_blank"><img src="http://danielhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/avatar-bluemeenie.jpg" border="0" alt="Avatar Blue Meenie" width="480" height="264" /></a></p>
<p>Now don’t get me wrong. I enjoyed Avatar, I really did. I do <em>not </em>put in the category of a turd &#8211; not at all. I  think that Cameron created a beautiful and remarkable world on Pandora. I  appreciated the astonishing attention to all the production design, the visual  effects, makeup, and the great attention paid to every last detail, but when  you’ve got 4+ years and <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/oscars/2009/12/how-much-did-avatar-really-cost.html" target="_blank">a reported $280 million</a> to spend, I expect as much&#8230;and I was duly entertained. I do have issues however. First with the story. The Avatar concept was <em>interesting</em>, but was nothing even remotely original. If  you haven’t seen it yet on Facebook or elsewhere, the now-classic <a href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/01/james-camerons-avatar-disneys-pocahontas" target="_blank">comparison  between Avatar and Disney’s Pocahontas</a> pretty much nails it. Face it folks,  it’s Technicolor fluff with guns and lots of big explosions. Another web  phenomenon, but also a really strange and questionable choice, was that of  using <a href="http://www.papyruswatch.com/2009/08/avatar-really.html" target="_blank">Papyrus as the font for the titles and subtitles</a>. It was a very  distracting disconnect, especially for those of us who have a deep fondness for  font in design.</p>
<p>I found Cameron’s heavy-handed, hardly transparent and  self-righteous political correctness with his obvious analogies to Native  Americans (getting back to Pocahontas) and their “connection to all things  living,” a people in touch with the natural energies of the world,  manipulative. His obvious “green” messages about energy dependence vs. a purer  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism" target="_blank">Pantheist</a> view of the world (which I in fact embrace) were smug and  sanctimonious.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.avatarmovie.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://danielhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/avatar-cost.jpg" border="0" alt="We have technology...and LOTS of money!" width="475" height="265" /></a></p>
<p>The piece that really surprised me however was how the films  starts first with our common enemy, the evil  hawk of a general, engaging in a non-provoked aggression against a lesser race for  their natural energy supplies (sounds familiar, right?), which of course we rally  against, feeling politically correct ourselves [look up <a href="http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/activity/imperialism/" target="_top">The White Man’s Burden</a>].  Our hero, a jarhead with the muddled sensibility of a blue-collar Jersey  construction worker has apparently experienced a spiritual awakening of sorts,  and comes back to save the day (as the natives are clearly incapable of saving  themselves). A seemingly unintended message, we are left with a subtly  patronizing act of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noblesse_oblige" target="_blank">noblesse oblige</a>, wherein the (enlightened) white man has to  come in and help the savages out. The subtext is one of superiority, that we  must help those out that cannot help themselves, because <em>they</em> are  inevitably inferior and ignorant.</p>
<p>Hurt Locker on the other hand, was powerful in the most  visceral sense, in the deepest emotionally impacting sense. It is a film about  real brutality, and is portrayed in such a way as to make you feel like a fly  on the wall observer. It takes hard looks into the damaged psyche of soldiers  in war, and should be included in the list of the great war movies along  with Gallipoli, Paths of Glory, Full Metal Jacket, Platoon and The Deer Hunter.  It is a beautiful film dealing with the stark and upsetting realities of war,  and is an undeniable piece of modern-day classic cinema…and it deserves to win  the best picture Oscar along with Katherine Bigelow for best director. <a href="http://thehurtlocker-movie.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://danielhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hurt-locker.jpg" border="0" alt="The Hurt Locker" width="475" height="307" /></a></p>
<p>This battle between the Epic Goliath that is Avatar  against the smaller, but ultimately more powerful Hurt Locker is of even greater and gossipier  interest as Katherine Bigelow and James Cameron were once married. What’s more,  it it’s entire 82 years of existence, The Academy has <em>never</em> given the  best director award to a woman. Speaking of political correctness, giving the  woman the award would be the “right thing to do,” but more than that, her work  is simply more deserving. <a href="http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/82/nominees.html" target="_blank">The 82nd Academy Awards</a> airs on March 7th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielhouse.com/avatar_vs_hurt_locker.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

